“You’re a novice, Conor.”
“An idealist.”
“A dreamer.”
“Naïve.”
“Unrealistic.”
Flippant statements like these are casually and persistently thrown at peacemakers.
However, we have a response.
Peacemakers know better than to be trivially dismissed by the “wisdom of realists” To paraphrase Gandhi, the only reason I’m alive and able to compose this essay is through some preservation of non-violence.
Defending the merits of non-violence over violence is purely perfunctory. Per the transcendental value of ahimsa is an indisputable axiom. Unfortunately, the military industrial complex conjoined with media complicity and government propaganda has severely sabotaged this maxim.
By obfuscating issues and linguistically manipulating concepts, nations across the world mischievously deceive citizens. For once you accept the concept of a just war; you’re vulnerable to further unintelligent influence. In short, we’re being duped unbeknownst to ourselves.
Although I’m a fervent believer in striving for perfection, I’m not foolish to believe I’ll achieve it. Eradicating evil is futile, but equipping people with discipline, knowledge, peace, and love will bring us much further than continued ignorance or helpless submission. Much of the world nebbishy exists as Henry David Thoreau put it, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” I know from personal experience.
It’s time to change, and I want to be a catalyst of the movement.
My journey into Satyagraha wasn’t always easy. For many years, I was an acknowledged hypocrite—ill prepared to tackle life’s quandaries coming from a secular background. After identifying good and evil, what binds you to the proper action? This conundrum rattles my brain relentlessly.
Sure, I was ethically opposed to slaughtering animals, physical altercations, and prostitution, yet I indulged nonetheless. Existentially grasping for inner strength and resolution, I found solace and advice in books. However I didn’t buy any particular book, hook, line and sinker.
My mind is provincially opposed to aggregating my thoughts into one doctrine. And so I question everything. And learned something; by incorporating various tenets of philosophy and religion via my texts I’ve slowly grown more spiritual. From Kafka to C.S. Lewis, Shakespeare to Timothy Keller, Sam Harris to Calvin Miller, I immersed myself in material. And what I found was a gnawing inner loathing.
I felt guilt for being white. I felt guilt for the luxury and wealth that surrounded me.
I recognized a distinct advantage I held over others was not solely monetary (though indeed it was), rather intangible. I had abundant love and support. My parents are happily married. I have collegiately educated siblings. I was taller, more attractive than my peers. My athletic prowess and the subsequent accolades resulting from my achievements enabled a surly complex to form. My arrogance pervaded my demeanor and I scoffed at others.
I didn’t need a degree in psychology to ascertain my outward disdain for others was a personal projection. My silver spoon shined brightly, yet I was discontent with my dedication to apathy.
Why care? I believed it better to live an indulgent life than one of principle.
Until recently.
For many years I used my intelligence to manipulate situations in my favor. For example, I would justify my hobby of shoplifting by hedonistically enjoying the thrill and nihilistically rejecting exploitation through capitalism. Despite my various immoral actions, I’d muster some weathered excuse for my behavior. Audaciously, I’d explain sleeping with prostitutes as a philanthropic venture. How else were these women to earn a living?
Toying with my inner torment, my conscience finally matured and developed much to my chagrin.
Karma has its way of leveling the playing field. Eventually the thrills I sought became cheaper. The scenarios I controlled backfired. The misery in my heart was commensurate to the misery I’d caused.
It’s difficult to determine a precise moment of epiphany. Albeit, after reading Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, I felt empowered.
Empowerment came through penitence. Filling my heart with love and forgiveness forged a new component of my soul. I forgave others for their misdeeds, but more importantly, forgave me. However, if I ceased my progress there, it would be like rescuing a toddler from drowning only to abandon it onshore.
More was required.
So I continued searching for something everlasting. Previously eschewing any notion of permanence (worried I’d then forfeit malleability) I found something percolating my brain.
Peace.
I will dedicate my life to the promotion of non-violent action and education. Finally, my mental excavation exposed the core of my existence. Although I was dismayed by how quickly my new found passion was ridiculed. Friends of mine attempted to dilute my righteousness. Suddenly, I was out of the mainstream and no longer a pragmatist. Pathetically guffawed.
My transformative experience over the past year produced many obstacles like the aforementioned. At times I relapse and stunt my progress. Other times I feel helpless and ineffective. Yet the reserves I possess via Satyagraha propel me past these impediments.
So what’s the next step?
The most obvious step is self-cleansing. Like Jack Nicolson mocks in Anger Management, “He was wondering how a man weighing 600 pounds could teach people about self-discipline (referring to Buddha).” And Like Gandhi proclaimed, “You must be the change you wish to see.” In order to attain credibility, I have to adhere to the principles I demand in others.
Additionally, the marketing plan for peace pales in comparison to the organized inculcation used by the military.
Modifications need to be made there as well.
People, being supremely susceptible to advertisements, desire a cause or product to ingratiate into. Why not peace? Obviously it’s because the overwhelming influence and power military holds. Fear is a great motivator (And a great governmental tactic). Yet, marketing with love also has its advantages.
Working within the paradigm that exists, I try to replicate the appearance of my peers, thereby maintaining credibility while altering the prisms of philosophy. Succinctly, rather than separating myself from society via reclusiveness, I maneuver within. I believe my efficacy is stronger when people don’t perceive me as outlandish (even though unfortunately, I am). Hence, by placing emphasis on my appearance and health on the outset, people will be more inclined to revere and respect what I have to say. Basically, I’m using a clever sales technique to persuade - though I’m conscious not to discount the gravity of my product.
A product I can tattoo in my skin. A product that’s innate value doesn’t always pay immediate dividends. But a product that is benevolent and universal. A product that warms the heart yet is immaterial.
I don’t profess omniscience. At 23 years young, my journey is meager compared to many—in this sense, the critics are right, I am a novice. By emulating the men and women of peace, I’m following in giant footsteps.
What gives me strength is the confidence I’m on the right track.